Sunday, November 24, 2013

Blog #3: What Caused the Fall of Rome



24 November 2013
                                    Blog #3: What Caused the Fall of Rome
                        Rome had a reputation to uphold of being the strongest empire the world had ever known. Although there were problems plaguing the Romans, the government thought it essential to uplift the people and distract them with spectacle-heavy events and games. After all, The Roman Empire came into existence by conquering weaker nations and taking their land. To admit that their own nation was facing the threat of being overthrown in a similar manner was unthinkable.
                        To understand what toppled the greatest nation on the world had seen up to that point, I turned to the book, “AD 410: The Year That Shook Rome” by Sam Moorhead and David Stuttard. From their book, I learned that the Huns, a barbaric tribe from the central Asian steppes, were sweeping Westward through Europe, causing chaos and death wherever they went. The threat of encountering the Huns as they swept through Europe caused more and more barbaric European tribes to push toward the borders of the Roman Empire. “The pressure of these tribes became unbearable, and by 376 reports began to reach the Roman court of throngs of barbarians massing on the farther banks of the Danube” (pg. 56).
                        Most of these people came from the Visigoths, the western branch of a greater Gothic tribe in modern day North-East Germany. The Visigoths were once one of the most feared tribes in Europe because they were known for plundering cities and nations along the coastal strips of the Black Sea. “By the final years of Constantine’s reign, during the 330s, the Goths and Romans became allies. The Goths settled in the lands of Dacia, once conquered as a Roman province, but now a useful buffer zone against the eastern barbarian tribes” (pg. 57).
                        When the Visigoths were displaced by the Huns, the Romans had an excellent opportunity to use their new allies to their advantage. They could have joined forces with the Visigoths to build an invincible army, “but the Romans sneered at these people whom they considered to be barbarians […] How the Romans dealt with them was crucial. If the Goths had been settled along the Danube, given lands and been integrated within the empire, the Romans could have benefited from their manpower and labor. If the Romans had fed the hungry barbarians in the days and weeks after their desperate crossing, they might have earned their gratitude and loyalty. Instead, they treated the Goths with arrogance and cruelty, exploiting their weakness. The Romans even bartered mean rations of cheap food, stale mouldy bread and the carcasses of dogs for Gothic youths, whom they immediately enslaved” (pg. 58-59). The Visigoths rebelled against the Romans and these mighty warriors gave the Romans a number of devastating losses on the battle field, from which they were never quite able to recover.
                        The Romans, in their arrogance, threw away an opportunity to make powerful friends and instead made devastating enemies.

No comments:

Post a Comment